Prosecutors across the United States face an unprecedented level of scrutiny. Attorneys funded by outside interests are repeatedly filing failure to train and supervise claims against prosecutors’ offices in an effort to obtain a departure or reversal of the landmark decision Connick v. Thompson. Furthermore, there is a significant and well-funded effort to end absolute immunity for prosecutors, and action which would subject prosecutors to liability for issues about which they had no knowledge and over which they had no control. Finally, there is an increasing push to widen the gap between prosecution and investigation, limiting how prosecutors can investigate and prepare their cases without fear of no longer being shielded by absolute immunity.
Both Laura Rodrigue and Blake Arcuri have previously worked as prosecutors and understand the challenges and implications which exist in this area of law. Because of that, our fight for prosecutors is a personal one. We have defended against all conceivable claims against prosecutors.
Our Experience
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims
- Brady Violation Claims
- Wrongful Conviction Claims
- False Arrest Claims
- Malicious Prosecution Claims
- Failure to Train & Supervise Claims
- First Amendment Claims
- State Negligence/Tort Claims
- State Bar Disciplinary Complaints
Other Services
In a world of increasing official-capacity claims, agencies desiring to limit and be successful in future litigation must rely on legally sound policies. Additionally, in addition to litigation and law enforcement defense, our team provides legal-based training and policy development. Finally, we provide support and assistance immediately following serious reversals or newly-discovered evidence. These events can lead to litigation and therefore immediate preparations and a concise strategy are necessary.
For government entities, municipalities, law enforcement, and corrections officers facing civil liability, see our pages dedicated to these specific areas.